#302 Yesterday, 07:37 AM
oil painter
Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I
Posts: 491

Last night I woke up several times with this MM/ Sherrie subject in my mind. My angel said this in explanation about the astrological chart. It would be a human conclusion to believe an individual would replicate a birthchart. MM lived and recorded her life within the Oversoul. The information is already there. It would be redundent to record it twice.
The birthchart actually supports the idea she isn't MM, the idea being that another of the Oversoul group would be working with the same issues which wouldn't be a stretch to believe if Sherrie and MM are twin souls like twins that are mirror images of each other. My understanding is the South Node is a person's karma...where you have been, like the stupid saying been, there, done that. The North Node is your dharma, where you want to go, what you want to achieve. Having said all of this I had the brilliant idea to go to Amazon.com and read the reviews on the book. I will post a review but I will admit there was 13 reviews and out of 13, 11 were five stars. I chose the one review that I felt was less than satisfied. It just resonated with me.





Reviewer:Valerie J. Wood "(Author of Enforcer)" (Baltimore, MD) - See all my reviews
" This is an interesting read, but I'm certainly not convinced....I do happen to believe in past lives and reincarnation, and have had that interest for many years, having read many astounding books on the subject.


Add to that the fact I'm also a fairly knowledgeable fan of MM's (if having a collection of over 55 books which I've read, some several times, about Miss Monroe, her films and life, and a collection of MM items, some owned or worn by MM, which is pretty wide-range, qualifies). OK; so I'm an avid fan. She was a beautiful, fascinating woman and I've long been interested in her personality, thoughts and trying to figure out why she was and is so fascinating. In this book, some of the statements made and supposably 'confirmed' in the past life regression transcripts just don't quite ring true to my inquisitive mind. Little details, but telling. There's nothing in here that a biography of Miss Monroe's cannot provide as fodder for the regressions, and the main outside source, claimed by the author as confirming that Sherrie and Marilyn are one and the same (Ted Jordan) is hardly one of the most highly-regarded Marilyn Monroe confidants.



I do feel that perhaps the regressionist actually believes the subject's statements and perhaps she (the subject, Sherrie) believes them, as well.


Problem is that it's just way too easy to simulate and imitate MM's interests and, to cite one example, the oft-repeated inferance that popping pills and champagne together is a 'hit' as to accuracy of MM's reincarnation....well, I am not convinced.



This book is an interesting read, but definitely take it with a grain of salt, as they say. If Sherrie is 'channelling' Marilyn (which is denied in the book), well, there are still some problems with the information as presented under the transcripts of the regressions. Like giving the wrong name of the character Marilyn Monroe played in Millionaire; wrong age at making of River of No Return, etc. This book reads more like a mean possession than a reincarnation. Also there is noticably a lot of 'leading the witness' in the transcripts. Additionally, it is troubling that the writer attempts to justify not being able to regress Sherrie's daughter, who they claim is a reincarnation of Gladys Baker (Norma Jean's mother) because she was 'crazy.'






Photographs show some similarities between Sherrie (the subject) and Marilyn's features, but frankly a lot of women over the years have worked to emulate Marilyn's look. It's pretty easy to tell the difference between Marilyn's photos and those of Sherrie's which sometimes look staged to emulate her. The similarities were interesting but not all that remarkable and hardly conclusive. If you look at photographs of actress Poppy Montgomery--well, there you will see a definite resemblance. And, a lot of type is spent in this book claiming that biometrics allow for one to reincarnate looking quite similar to a past life. Hmmmm. With some of us, it takes a little help from Miss Clairol, as well.









I gave this book a rating of 3 stars for 'average.' Perhaps I was too kind in some respects. I got the distinct feeling that the reincarnate Sherrie did not care much for Marilyn. There was a lot of focus on MM versus the individual, Norma Jean, as well, which I wondered at. At times there is a tone of hysteria which is probably supposed to emulate MM's mindset. It gets a little overblown at times.






Of course, this reincarnation claim also then contradicts statements by such well-known psychics as Sylvia Browne, who has stated in one of her books that she made contact with Marilyn's spirit at her (MM's) home in Brentwood...must be a little hard to speak to a spirit in one place if she's already reincarnated in Scotland (no less!), in order to move to Canada...."



I am not going to read the book because I am just not into movie stars and MM. To choose a seedy, dysfunctional, self absorbed movie star to demonstrate to the world that reincarnation is a truth makes me almost laugh, after all, this is America where Dancing with the Stars is the number one TV show. It just reinforces to me how humans can take a MM or an Elvis and create a religion around them. My interest was mainly in the oversoul concept as a possible reason for two people to have past life recall to one individual. Adrian's book is doing well judging from the Amazon info so no worries, Adrian. Sex sells.
OP
__________________
http://lesliemacon.blogspot.com


Last edited by oil painter : Yesterday at 07:52 AM.





#303 Yesterday, 07:58 AM
oil painter
Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I
Posts: 491









Brianstalin, I am muddying the water again. What is your take on Poppy Montgomery?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poppy_Montgomery

__________________
http://lesliemacon.blogspot.com




#304 Yesterday, 09:15 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 751














Well, if you're talking about past lives, I got a connection to Princess Viktoria Luise of Prussia, the grandmother of Queen Sofía of Spain.

Poppy does look a bit like MM after her plastic surgeries, but there is no direct past life connection.





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poppy_Montgomery






#305 Yesterday, 11:07 AM
pastlifetherapy
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 45



















Hi,

At this moment I realize that it is futile to continue to expose Sherrie, a beautiful pure soul, and me, to the ignorant or biased and unfair abuse and negativity of some members of this encounter group. Only the negative possibilities are expressed by these members. Unlike Sherrie and I, these members are like denying that the shortest distance between two points is a straight line, and make it into a loop. It is like instead of touching the ear closer to one's hand, one is touching the other one far out...It is like saying when it is light that it is dark. It is like saying it is a chicken, though it walks like a duck, it quaks like a duck and it looks like a duck. What is the motif you guys that you act like that? Is it fear, envy, jealousy, hatred or just plain stubbornness? Unless there is a change in this unbalanced behaviour by these members, I'll stop posting and Sherrie will probably too. I advise her to stop posting too. But surely she will decide for herself. We'll stick by fair and open-minded people. After all, for those who believe (that Sherrie Lea Laird IS the reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe) no explanation is necessary, and for those who do not, no explanation is possible. (They would not even read the book, which presents compelling facts.)

God bless you all,

Adrian


Last edited by pastlifetherapy : Yesterday at 11:46 AM.






















#306 Yesterday, 11:46 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 751









How?



How do you intend to prove to the world that Sherrie is the reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe?
















#307 Yesterday, 12:06 PM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 751


















If I wanted to prove the superiority of my psychic vision over yours, I would not seek any confirmation from other people or try to find "experts" to back up my claims. That belongs to basic training.

The only way forward is to teach others how to see past lives for themselves.

This requires teaching people methods of opening their third eyes.

This goes way beyond the limitations of hypnotherapy.













#308 Yesterday, 12:21 PM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 751















As patients or clients we are limited and depend solely upon the good will of our healers and teachers. As skilled practioners of Kundalini awakening, we can become masters of our own destinies. We can instantly obtain any knowledge that we may require regarding any of our own past lives, or the past lives of others.


Last edited by brianstalin : Yesterday at 12:30 PM.



















#309 Yesterday, 01:05 PM
pastlifetherapy
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 45













Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
How do you intend to prove to the world that Sherrie is the reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe?














Sherrie and I know that our book: "Marilyn Monroe Returns: The Healing of a Soul," is our main messenger to the world, for those with an open heart and mind--for those with open ears to hear and open eyes to see.


#310 Yesterday, 01:26 PM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 751
















With open third eyes, we do not need to take any messengers on faith. We see truth without needing to be directed by others towards it (or becoming the victims of those seeking to deflect us away from it).


















#311 Yesterday, 02:20 PM
pastlifetherapy
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 45












Rigid dogmas, "scientific" (past-life regression misinterpretation and misapplication,) or "spiritual" (misinterpretation and misapplication, third eye, kundalini, pendulum, etc.,) limit us, block us and separate us from God, THE-ALL-KNOWER. How can we cleave to IT to get our correct answers? I submit that Godless pursuits are on the dark side and doomed to failure. I wholeheartedly have faith in GOD and I'm sure SHE/HE will answer for me and the whole world, as we are ONE. And the answer usually comes not from hypnotic past-life regressions, third eye, Kundalini or pendulum, that are just agencies, through which the Principle of Perfection of God manifests. Let’s keep them as conduits and not make them into blocks, and shoot ourselves in the foot so to speak! Besides, INFINITE IS THE NUMBER OF GOD'S WAYS. With our limited intelligence, we may not grasp the secrets of the universe, or think we do. The prominent American surgeon, LaPlace said: "What we know is little; what we don't know is immense." (Divinely inspired.) But, by faith in GOD, we align ourselves with ITS INFINITE INTELLIGENCE, with ITS WAYS, no matter what agency we use. We must always remember, that the agencies we use have value, for sure, only when used as a REAL conduit through which GOD's Principle of Perfection works.
















#312 Yesterday, 02:40 PM
oil painter
Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I
Posts: 491






















Adrian,

If seeking the truth is a Godless pursuit then by all means consider me dark and Godless. Whatever you think, I only am curious how two people can access one soul's past life. That is it. You have a book to sell and the bottom line is the intimate information that Sherrie revealed to you under hypnosis is being used by you to sell a book. There is no mystery to that and it is pretty much the same exploitation that MM had happen to her throughout her life. If you go on CNN Showbiz today and promote a spiritual book on reincarnation, who between me and you is dark and Godless. I have no agenda but to know the truth. You need for Sherrie to be MM so all of the tantilizing pillow talk of JFK and whoever she bedded that you uncovered can be percieved as credible. It works for people that buy and read People magazine and the Enquirer. It is of no interest to me.
I cannot believe you think that that you can spin love and light and a valentine to the world from such a pathetic disturbed person and think no one would challenge it. Her healing maybe should have been done in privacy and confidentliality. Who is remiss in the protection of Sherrie? Me because I ask hard questions or you who has a book to sell? I would expect ou to not hang around and answer what might require your total honesty. A long time ago a psychic told me "Leslie, in this life it will be the intent, the motive behind the act that you will need to work on." I challenge you with the same.
OP
__________________
http://lesliemacon.blogspot.com
















#313 Yesterday, 02:52 PM
Tomina
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1
















Greetings!


After carefully following this and other threads on the subject, it seems to me -- just a friendly suggestion -- that Adrian, Sherrie, Brianstalin and anyone who finds her/himself very passionate about something would benefit from searching for the root answers to questions like these:

- Why is it so important to you that people accept the Sherrie/Marilyn
connection (or whatever you feel very passionate about) the way you see
it?

- What feels to be out of order and bothersome when people present a
different viewpoint on this subject?

- Considering that one's understanding of something is simply a relative
truth, what makes other perspectives on it less valid?


Sticking to a particular point of view (relative truth) without finding a way to see another viewpoint, which seemingly opposes the former, from a perspective where the two complement each other is not really productive except for reaffirming the ego. This new perspective is one step closer to the truth.

There are many ways to view what we call reincarnation, and the more flexible we are in our attempts to make sense of this phenomenon the less anchored we will be in the concept itself, which will help us grow toward truth.

The Sufis, for example, look at "past-life" impressions as just that: impressions. According to them, when a chunk of Divine Consciousness (soul) takes on a relative distinctness it vibrates slower and slower and, as it were, "descends" through the planes, taking-on some portion of the attributes of each plane.

When it encounters the plane of Mind and the impressions dumped there by the souls returning to their Source (these impressions cannot be carried "higher" than their own level of vibration and are released by the returning soul), the "descending" soul takes them on as well, and these impressions, accreted to the being according to the laws of attraction, help form the sense of a separate identity, like dust settling on a mirror.

The substance (Essence) of the soul is initially "impressed" by its creation/Creator with a certain purpose and with an affinity for certain qualities. Each soul has a unique trajectory both from Unity and in returning to Unity. This is held to be true even down to the manifestation of the physical body and the tendencies of the personality and the personal ego.

The important thing here is that through this process of accumulating and later releasing these impressions/identifications/experiences the soul comes to apprehend its own deep substance, its Essence. In other words, the very elements that form the structure (ego) which binds us in ignorance of who we really are, present the tools which we can use in order to get to the truth. Suppressed/subconscious memories, "past-life" impressions, all our needs and wants, everything we like and dislike, etc. -- are clues into who/what we truly are and, if carefully, honestly and diligently followed and truly understood -- seen for what they are, clear of the filters/veils of the ego -- can lead us to awakening. Here, on this plane, as human incarnations, we have the precious opportunity to dedicate every moment to this task and are given the most tools, compared to all other planes, to accomplish it.

Just another point of view.

Best wishes to all,
Tomina
















#314 Yesterday, 03:14 PM
pastlifetherapy
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 45



















Quote:
Originally Posted by oil painter
Adrian,

If seeking the truth is a Godless pursuit then by all means consider me dark and Godless. Whatever you think, I only am curious how two people can access one soul's past life. That is it. You have a book to sell and the bottom line is the intimate information that Sherrie revealed to you under hypnosis is being used by you to sell a book. There is no mystery to that and it is pretty much the same exploitation that MM had happen to her throughout her life. If you go on CNN Showbiz today and promote a spiritual book on reincarnation, who between me and you is dark and Godless. I have no agenda but to know the truth. You need for Sherrie to be MM so all of the tantilizing pillow talk of JFK and whoever she bedded that you uncovered can be percieved as credible. It works for people that buy and read People magazine and the Enquirer. It is of no interest to me.
I cannot believe you think that that you can spin love and light and a valentine to the world from such a pathetic disturbed person and think no one would challenge it. Her healing maybe should have been done in privacy and confidentliality. Who is remiss in the protection of Sherrie? Me because I ask hard questions or you who has a book to sell? I would expect ou to not hang around and answer what might require your total honesty. A long time ago a psychic told me "Leslie, in this life it will be the intent, the motive behind the act that you will need to work on." I challenge you with the same.
OP



I'm not going to repeat myself. I explained in previous posts what are Sherrie's and my true intentions, including the book's purpose. You choose to turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to that, and still, with your mind made, continue your mud- slinging. I'm not sure it is part of Dharma, or Light.

Therefore, I'm not going to continue to defend Sherrie and me against destructive, not constructive criticism, as it doesn't seem to penetrate.

















#315 Yesterday, 04:29 PM
oil painter
Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I
Posts: 491



















Adrian,

Why can't you get this through your head. I am not expecting you to defend Sherrie. I am open to Sherrie being Marilyn. I am also open to Szuszu being Marilyn and open to Brian's friend being Marilyn. I am curious how several souls can access one soul's lifetime. Okay? Whether Sherrie is MM or not makes not one bit of difference. Brianstalin and I both repeatedly have gotten a No as to Sherrie being Marilyn. Okay, why? I believe you had hypnosis with Sherrie and I believe she gave you MM oriented information.
Can Szuszu also make that same claim? Yes. So? How is that possible. No-one is slinging anything. It is seeking of the truth, Adrian, not your truth or my truth, but the truth. We can all contribute to the search. You are the only one that would have something to fear from the truth. Your book is selling, what are you worried about?
OP

PS- Do you even understand the meaning of dharma?
__________________
http://lesliemacon.blogspot.com



















#316 Yesterday, 04:31 PM
oil painter
Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I
Posts: 491













Tomina,

Welcome to this discussion. Another viewpoint is welcome.
OP
__________________
http://lesliemacon.blogspot.com















#317 Yesterday, 04:52 PM
oil painter
Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I
Posts: 491



















I was doing a search for info on the oversoul and lo and behold our fellow member ElleRaNa has a wonderful explanation on her website...



"The oversoul, as one unit, downloads and uploads information to, from and between its counterparts and aspects - all with the same intent. So, as an individual person you will have your own memory of your lifetimes and you may also recall lifetimes shared by the collective memory of your oversoul. Sometimes an individual may believe they are somebody in the "past" or "future" when they are sharing in the collective oversoul memory. One aspect or counterpart of yourself is experiencing it, but you may not be focusing on the same lifetime as that aspect or counterpart."



Okay Adrian, this is what I am trying to understand.









#318 Yesterday, 04:56 PM
oil painter
Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I
Posts: 491































#319 Yesterday, 06:07 PM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 751





Quote:

Rigid dogmas, "scientific" (past-life regression misinterpretation and misapplication,) or "spiritual" (misinterpretation and misapplication, third eye, kundalini, pendulum, etc.,) limit us, block us and separate us from God, THE-ALL-KNOWER. How can we cleave to IT to get our correct answers? I submit that Godless pursuits are on the dark side and doomed to failure. I wholeheartedly have faith in GOD and I'm sure SHE/HE will answer for me and the whole world, as we are ONE. And the answer usually comes not from hypnotic past-life regressions, third eye, Kundalini or pendulum, that are just agencies, through which the Principle of Perfection of God manifests. Let’s keep them as conduits and not make them into blocks, and shoot ourselves in the foot so to speak! Besides, INFINITE IS THE NUMBER OF GOD'S WAYS. With our limited intelligence, we may not grasp the secrets of the universe, or think we do. The prominent American surgeon, LaPlace said: "What we know is little; what we don't know is immense." (Divinely inspired.) But, by faith in GOD, we align ourselves with ITS INFINITE INTELLIGENCE, with ITS WAYS, no matter what agency we use. We must always remember, that the agencies we use have value, for sure, only when used as a REAL conduit through which GOD's Principle of Perfection works.


















#320 Yesterday, 06:25 PM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 751













Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomina


Greetings!




After carefully following this and other threads on the subject, it seems to me -- just a friendly suggestion -- that Adrian, Sherrie, Brianstalin and anyone who finds her/himself very passionate about something would benefit from searching for the root answers to questions like these:

- Why is it so important to you that people accept the Sherrie/Marilyn
connection (or whatever you feel very passionate about) the way you see
it?

- What feels to be out of order and bothersome when people present a
different viewpoint on this subject?

- Considering that one's understanding of something is simply a relative
truth, what makes other perspectives on it less valid?


Sticking to a particular point of view (relative truth) without finding a way to see another viewpoint, which seemingly opposes the former, from a perspective where the two complement each other is not really productive except for reaffirming the ego. This new perspective is one step closer to the truth.

There are many ways to view what we call reincarnation, and the more flexible we are in our attempts to make sense of this phenomenon the less anchored we will be in the concept itself, which will help us grow toward truth.

The Sufis, for example, look at "past-life" impressions as just that: impressions. According to them, when a chunk of Divine Consciousness (soul) takes on a relative distinctness it vibrates slower and slower and, as it were, "descends" through the planes, taking-on some portion of the attributes of each plane.

When it encounters the plane of Mind and the impressions dumped there by the souls returning to their Source (these impressions cannot be carried "higher" than their own level of vibration and are released by the returning soul), the "descending" soul takes them on as well, and these impressions, accreted to the being according to the laws of attraction, help form the sense of a separate identity, like dust settling on a mirror.

The substance (Essence) of the soul is initially "impressed" by its creation/Creator with a certain purpose and with an affinity for certain qualities. Each soul has a unique trajectory both from Unity and in returning to Unity. This is held to be true even down to the manifestation of the physical body and the tendencies of the personality and the
personal ego.

The important thing here is that through this process of accumulating and later releasing these impressions/identifications/experiences the soul comes to apprehend its own deep substance, its Essence. In other words, the very elements that form the structure (ego) which binds us in ignorance of who we really are, present the tools which we can use in order to get to the truth. Suppressed/subconscious memories, "past-life" impressions, all our needs and wants, everything we like and dislike, etc. -- are clues into who/what we truly are and, if carefully, honestly and diligently followed and truly understood -- seen for what they are, clear of the filters/veils of the ego -- can lead us to awakening. Here, on this plane, as human incarnations, we have the precious opportunity to dedicate every moment to this task and are given the most tools, compared to all other planes, to accomplish it.

Just another point of view.

Best wishes to all,
Tomina











Hi Tomina,

I'm pretty sure past lives are illusions. As for reincarnation, I choose to work with it, because of its healing benefits. I do not have to be limited by belief systems. I do not require other people to believe in things. I do not require people to open their third eyes. I'm presenting alternative information that may or may not be correct and I also mention certain processes that enable us to work with higher objective truth. The Akashic Records are there and can be read by everyone. If we want to cling to any subjectivity, they cannot be read accurately.

I believe there are many ways to interpret the data from the Sherrie/Marilyn case.

















#321 Yesterday, 01:39 AM
bloom
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 34




Brianstalin,
I need not your contradictory fiction.













#322 Yesterday, 01:58 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 758





Quote:
Originally Posted by oil painter
"If we decide to make more of a conscious connection to our aspects and counterparts, our oversoul, we must be ready for the major issues that will no doubt be exposed in order to work through any unresolved residue we may have that needs confronting and healing. Do not attempt to do this and think it's a piece of cake: very often, it's not. It is a life-changing experience."



I, personally, do not believe in the oversoul, unless we mean the unifying God force. I do know that we are drawn to the dominant personalities within our soul groups, we can identify with them and claim their past incarnations as our own.
I know this from personal experience. I also know that even skilled past life experts can come unstuck because of this, but only TEMPORARILY. In some incarnations we were the dominant figures of the soul group and others can, similarly, identify with our own past lives. Other members of our soul group can be thought of as our counterparts. As we progress, we are able to move into increasingly higher soul groups and leave others behind.


Last edited by brianstalin : Yesterday at 02:50 AM.















#323 Yesterday, 02:03 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 758




Quote:
Originally Posted by bloom




Brianstalin,
I need not your contradictory fiction.




When I pray to God and tell him the same thing. He just smiles.













#324 Yesterday, 02:21 AM
bloom
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 34










You are a creator of delusions.








Last edited by bloom : Yesterday at 02:23 AM.

















#325 Yesterday, 02:31 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 758




















We create our own delusions. Others cannot do that for us.




Last edited by brianstalin : Yesterday at 02:33 AM.















#326 Yesterday, 02:34 AM
osiris
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: D
Posts: 4,586












Oooooooo!



Quote:
Originally Posted by bloom
You are a creator of delusions.



This is why I am staying out of this.
Still this is quite interesting. I just sit back, and watch all these wheels spinning, and you know what?
I simply believe Sheerie at her word. Because she came here and had the guts to say so!
I know who I am. I do not have to prove it.










#327 Yesterday, 03:41 AM
osiris
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: D
Posts: 4,586

And Now.....



The Brutal Reality, as I see it, and as it has been from the very beginning.
This is the type of controversy which sells books.
__________________
Love, Michael, The Valkyrie
















#328 Yesterday, 02:08 PM
oil painter
Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I
Posts: 492



















Brianstalin,

The quote you used was from ElleRaNa's article and not my words. You write that you don't believe in the Oversoul and go on to talk about soul groups. You then proceed to rephrase the description of an oversoul, call it a soul group and it is the very thing I have been trying to understand and have been asking you about. I ask you again.....without betraying your friend's privacy, you have mentioned that you know who the real MM is and say it is a sister of your friend. Can you describe her? Is she obsessed with MM? Does she look like her? Has she altered herself to look like her?
Why do you think it is her other than the pendulum? When people alter their appearance with plastic surgery then how can you even rely on photos or physical characteristics as proof of anything? Please answer the questions about who and why you think MM is.
OP
__________________
http://lesliemacon.blogspot.com
















#329 Yesterday, 02:35 PM
janus212
Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 14












Quote:
Originally Posted by brianstalin
I'm pretty sure past lives are illusions.


Explain. This almost says that life is illusion, which it mainly is. On the other hand if I pinch myself...I do know that I AM Often illusions are illusions....:-)

Peace be with you fellow-wanderers.
And please be tolerant of each other’s stage of his/her journey.

Jan Egil
Still no snow here in global-warmed Norway
















#330 Today, 02:02 AM
Sherrie Lea Laird
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 36













Quote by B.S "With open third eyes, we do not need to take any messengers on faith. We see truth without needing to be directed by others towards it (or becoming the victims of those seeking to deflect us away from it)."

interesting. Trace all the things you've said and done towards my case per se....you infact are making it a big deal not us.
See the thing is, while you go to bat for someone who 'regressed' or so they said for 10 minutes, I on the other hand regressed, as a young sherrie, teen, child and birth, then I regressed on my minds eye and intimate details of being both norma jeane and marilyn, at birth, 6, 9, 16, 17, 19, 21, 27, 29, 31, 35 and ultimately the excruciating death at 36. by my own undoing... it was something I could not predict to feel, or expect nor imagine, and contrary to Suzanna's it was not fun, I said Kezia was Gladys and that our live was one of pain but we were here to mend, YOU yourself verified that. in which I said case closed, I brought you little old 'nobody' Gladys. and handed over the baton to Susanna the superimposer. Well, should I say she isn't.
to suit you I should Lie.... so in the meantime while the book was edited down to a third of it's size, and 10 percent of 50 gruelling hours of regressions on tape, 1000, question and I was never wrong, only the information on books were erroneous once or twice I said something along the lines of Clash of the titans, when I was struggling to say clash by night, WHiCH I CORRECTED as I would never pay attention to the next question when my mind was reeling to correct something it thought was wrong.

That lady who wrote that review happens to be none other than a former hater at the mmforum. once again my dad's cop advice comes into play. CONSIDER THE SOURCE.

it's silly, it's boring it's ridiculous, the book was edited down to a 1/3 of all the work doc and I did, it was also not easy to keep track of small errors that the editor did as I refused to edit it as I could not relive any more of this stuff for the time being.

one of them being, that it was BOBBY who wanted to get Fidel and they wrote that I said it was Jack.


SEE PEOPLE. you are forgetting a piece of the puzzle a very important one.

I don't study Marilyn Monroe, I'd have to study books and movies inorder to answer those questions.
On tv,thru hypnosis alone, you can erase someone's spider fears so that they are now able to pet and nuzzle a spider.
Imagine studying for a calculus examine but before you go in the Doctor erases all your knowledge of numbers. What do you think will happen, Pass with flying colors?

You know the answer and so do I. BUt guess what my wacky and wonderfully obsessed in the wrong direction friends. I Did. that's right I passed with FLYING IMPOSSIBLY accurate colors. And lots of people are writing emails to us with RAVE reviews of the book, even people from Danamo's site, and they all ask that I don't tell the others. which I never do.

See. grab the one that was written by a hater and as usual all the information they put will be wrong.

Sorry I didn't impose the pics on my head, or study up to make sure I got the things wrong oh. by the way, I said bobby was 2 years younger and right after I came out of an 8 hour day of trances I immediately wanted that corrected, however Sherrie Laird doesn't have a clue how old Bobby Kennedy is. Sorry thats just the way the cookie crumbles. too busy living the life I have now and you all can believe and stay stuck in the mud for as long as you so solemnly choose tata


Last edited by Sherrie Lea Laird : Today at 02:04 AM.














#331 Today, 02:08 AM
Sherrie Lea Laird
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 36
















"The Brutal Reality, as I see it, and as it has been from the very beginning.
This is the type of controversy which sells books."

I hate to pick on you the most Osiris. Not only do I not care about our 7.99 to 20.00 book that the publisher 85 or more percent owns.

But knowledge is like opening a window for a breath of fresh air. How can that be wrong. We are not on Oprah with a book full of Lies. that SHE rampantly added to her fav list and shoved down her herd of sheep audience.

It's crap that you or anyone would focus on that in a REINCARNATION FORUM

HELLO.. REincarnation anyone








__________________










#332 Today, 02:10 AM
Sherrie Lea Laird
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 36













and then we swung the pendulum to see if we should operate on his brain or was it actually infact, hemorroids.
Ooops
whatever.
Does any other reincarnate go thru this.
Looks like I have to go thru more,
and what doesn't kill you makes you stronger.
so thanks for that, all.
appreciate it













#333 Today, 02:36 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 758



















Quote:
Originally Posted by janus212
Explain. This almost says that life is illusion, which it mainly is.
On the other hand if I pinch myself...I do know that I AM
Often illusions are illusions....:-)





When we pinch ourselves in a dream we know that WE ARE - until we wake up.

We do no wake up without the arousal of Kundalini power.









#334 Today, 03:03 AM











brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 758









Quote:
Originally Posted by oil painter
Brianstalin,

The quote you used was from ElleRaNa's article and not my words. You write that you don't believe in the Oversoul and go on to talk about soul groups. You then proceed to rephrase the description of an oversoul, call it a soul group and it is the very thing I have been trying to understand and have been asking you about. I ask you again.....without betraying your friend's privacy, you have mentioned that you know who the real MM is and say it is a sister of your friend. Can you describe her? Is she obsessed with MM? Does she look like her? Has she altered herself to look like her?
Why do you think it is her other than the pendulum? When people alter their appearance with plastic surgery then how can you even rely on photos or physical characteristics as proof of anything? Please answer the questions about who and why you think MM is.
OP








A friend of mine is apparently Humphrey Bogart reincarnated. He is addicted to cigarettes and has a hard time giving them up. His favorite movie is "The African Queen". He doesn't let the possibility of being Bogie go to his head. He couldn't care less.

Truly, I suggested to him to that he could be regressed and use the notoriety for personal gain.
He just smiled. I think he had had a guts full of that (fame & fortune) in his previous life. He didn't seem at all interested in my proposal.




Reincarnation really isn't such a big deal for some people.


HEALING is.



As for my Marilyn, her past life amnesia is complete and to her Marilyn is just a movie star.





#377 Today, 04:56 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 774












Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherrie Lea Laird
no no, you have contradicted yourself, I noticed it too, when I first joined and you were talking to Janus etc. but I never even judged you on it or cared.
when you said Sher and K had reincarnated, mother and daughter stuff and that I was Marilyns daughter, then I was linked but you didn't know how, then Gladys is Kezia but I'm not Marilyn and a whole bunch of other Russian stuff, which by the way, I agreed with the Russian connection as surely it couldn't only be Natasha that I had loved the russian accent from and tried to name Kezia a Russian name, and did. Unknowingly as there are so many names to pick from


There are no contradictions in my pastlife readings. It appears that Kezia, Zsuzsanna and yourself were the daughters of Maria Feodorovna.
Maria Feodorovna married Tsar Paul.

Maria Feodorovna (Sophie Marie Dorothea of Württemberg) became Marilyn Monroe and Tsar Paul became Robert Kennedy.

It seems that GRAND DUCHESS ALEXANDRA PAVLOVNA became Sherrie Lee Laird.

GRAND DUCHESS ELENA PAVLOVNA became Kezia.

Grand Duchess Maria Pavlovna became Zsuzsanna.

GRAND DUCHESS ALEXANDRA PAVLOVNA, GRAND DUCHESS ELENA PAVLOVNA and Grand Duchess Maria Pavlovna were all daughters of Maria Feodorovna.












#378 Today, 04:59 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 774















Quote:
Originally Posted by pastlifetherapy
Brian, it seems, you hear only yourself. I explained in my previous post that my mission is one of healing, saving lives, and not to give a show of my mental or psychic prowess to an audience. I am bound by such a vow in my healing ministry--my mission, day in and day out. The proof is in the pudding. I prove my authenticity and integrity through being GOD's conduit to healing souls. I've done it so many times over lifetimes, and more than 30 years in this lifetime, and thank GOD, successfully. There is a wise saying in Sanskrit: "Baba nam, baba nam key valam, param pita baba key."
In English it translate: "If you give God full credit, victory is sure guarantee."



We all have a responsibility to check the information properly before we embark on any missions.













#379 Today, 05:15 AM
bloom
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 39





Quote:
Brianstalin: The fellow who guided my investigations into the Akashic Records used a pendulum for all of his past life work. (...)
He said hypnotism might work if we just went backwards one lifetime, but not beyond that.




Your guru acknowledges the possibilities of hypnotism if we went backwards one lifetime.


















#380 Today, 05:26 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 774




He is a good friend. He is not my guru.

Yes, that's what he said. He thinks that there's a slight possiblity to get some useful information this way. He warned me that the information can be readily tainted by ourselves, the bias of the hypnotherapist and external forces.

If you have studied metaphysics thoroughly, you would understand what I mean.

This is why we must not take things on faith.


















#381 Today, 05:40 AM
bloom
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 42





You love so much to quote him often. It does sound like if he is your guru.



Quote:
Brianstalin: I feel confident that Sherrie is not the reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe.
Common sense tells us that it's just too good to be true.



That gives you away!
















#382 Today, 05:42 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 779





If past lives are an open book to us, we can heal ourselves and others very easily. We get to see all the connections and understand that we are all much closer than we appear to be on the surface.










#383 Today, 05:47 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 779






Quote:
Originally Posted by bloom
You love so much to quote him often. It does sound like if he is your guru.


I respect anyone who can perform simple psychic tasks when asked to do so.

If the intention is for the highest good, we get a lot of assistance from the other side.











#384 Today, 06:26 AM
bloom
Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 42

Is this your Marilyn Monroe?








Last edited by bloom : Today at 06:31 AM.













#385 Today, 08:51 AM

brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 779











Apparently Sophie Dorothea of Württemberg (1759-1828) reincarnated as Marilyn Monroe.

#386 Today, 09:02 AM
brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 779

Sophia Dorothea Augusta Luisa von Württemberg

Here's another comparison of Marilyn before plastic surgeries and Sophie Dorothea of Württemberg (Sophia Dorothea Augusta Luisa von Württemberg).






#387 Today, 09:08 AM

brianstalin
Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 779







Perhaps as Zsuzsanna grows older she will resemble the middle-aged Sophie Dorothea of Württemberg.